NO CRIMINAL ADJUDICATION = NO INTERVENTION!
The U.S. Supreme Court has been clear for decades: fit parents have a fundamental right to raise their children free from government interference. This right comes from the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause and has been reaffirmed in cases like Troxel v. Granville (2000), Santosky v. Kramer (1982), and Stanley v. Illinois (1972).
What do these rulings say?
• Parents are presumed fit until proven otherwise with clear and convincing evidence.
• Hearsay, allegations, or civil disputes do not meet this standard.
• No criminal adjudication of unfitness = no lawful basis for state intervention.
Family courts and Title IV-D programs have financial incentives to micromanage families—but constitutional rights outweigh funding formulas. Judges cannot lawfully override parental rights without proving a parent is unfit or unwilling through due process and strict scrutiny.
No crime. No adjudication. No state power to interfere. That’s not just common sense—that’s constitutional law.
PARENTS, STAND UP! The bond between you and your child is UNTOUCHABLE, a fortress no court can breach without ironclad proof! Family courts have ZERO authority to interfere unless a parent is criminally adjudicated—found guilty by law—of unfitness or unwillingness to parent. Hearsay, rumors, or petty disputes? NOT ENOUGH! The system must respect the sacred parent-child relationship.
Demand that courts respect the parent-child bond. No evidence, no intervention—period!
