Judicial Accountability – Michigan Probate Court

Disclaimer: The following post summarizes allegations reported by the 7 Investigators (WXYZ) and statements from public officials. These matters are still under review by the Judicial Tenure Commission, and all parties are presumed innocent until proven otherwise in a court of law. This post is for public awareness and discussion, not to assert guilt or give legal advice.

Michigan’s court system is facing another serious controversy.

According to an investigative report, Judge Kathleen Ryan, a long-time Oakland County probate judge who makes life-altering decisions for families and people with disabilities, is accused of:

• Making racist and derogatory remarks (recorded by a senior court administrator)

• Using homophobic slurs and discussing explicit personal matters with staff

• Allegedly harassing a high-ranking court official for years

Chief Probate Judge Linda Hallmark removed Ryan from her docket after these recordings were shared with the Michigan Supreme Court and county leaders. The Judicial Tenure Commission will decide whether to open a formal investigation.

Why it matters: Judges hold enormous power over families, estates, and guardianships. Allegations like these raise urgent questions about oversight, accountability, and bias inside our courts.

Should states adopt stronger systems to monitor judges’ conduct and protect people in their courtrooms?

Disclaimer:

The following content is based on publicly reported information, court records, and statements from involved parties regarding allegations against a sitting judge. These allegations have not been fully adjudicated, and no final findings or disciplinary rulings have been issued unless stated by an official body. All individuals mentioned are presumed innocent until proven otherwise in a court of law or by a judicial disciplinary authority. This post is for public awareness and discussion only and is not legal advice, nor does it assert guilt or liability.